中文字幕网在线_欧美国产一区二区三区_三级av_国产精品免费一区二区_国产2区_日韩精品一区二区三区中文在线

中國(guó)酒業(yè)新聞網(wǎng)

華夏酒報(bào)官方網(wǎng)站

官方
微信
官方
微博
首頁 > English > 正文
Petrus wins trademark case in China
來源:Vino Joy News  2021-07-01 16:21 作者:NATALIE WANG
Bordeaux’s storied winery, Petrus, has secured a victory in China against fraudsters who are churning out non-existent Petrus second wine that was first spotted at the country’s biggest wine fair.
 
The judgement handed down by the Beijing People’s High Court upheld two previous court rulings that ruled in favor of the Pomerol estate against Wenzhou-based wine company, 溫州柏翠堡進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易有限公司 for the infringement of its legally trademarked Chinese name “伯萃斯”.
 
The Bordeaux winery was apparently alerted by a report that was done by me in 2017 at the China Food and Drinks Fair (Chengdu), the country’s biggest wine and spirits fair, when flagrant fakes were on open display at Kempski hotel. The fakes were so emboldened and prevalent, it could be best described as “Disneyland of fake wines”.
 
One of the copycat wines was produced none other but the Wenzhou company, claiming the lookalike PACURS as Petrus’ second label, which the Pomerol estate never produced. It also trademark a similar Chinese transliteration of Petrus “柏翠堡正牌” in 2015.
 
During the court proceedings, Petrus cited the report as part of the evidences it presented.
 
 
PACURS produced by Whenzhou based wine company 溫州柏翠堡進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易有限公司 has the look and feel of Petrus, but it is definitely not the second wine of Petrus. (pic: Taobao)
The 2017 report prompted Petrus to file a lawsuit against the Chinese company the next year at Beijing Intellectual Property Court, citing the Wenzhou company’s wine violated its officially trademarked Chinese name “伯萃斯”, which it had applied in 2014 one year before the Wenzhou company.
 
According to court documents released, Petrus argues the Wenzhou company used a similar sounding name and design to mislead the public, violating Article 30 of the Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China. This led to the court ruling in favour of Petrus.
 
However, the Wenzhou company appealed the case subsequently to the National Intellectual Property Court and ultimately Beijing High Court. Both upheld previous court ruling, handing Petrus a victory to use its trademarked Chinese name.
 
The Beijing High Court ruled that when two trademarks are applied on similar goods, the trademark rights is therefore granted on a first-come, first-served principle. In this case, Petrus .
 
Interestingly, this is not the first time the Wenzhou company was thrust into fake wine controversy. It is also the distributor of one of the fake Chateau Lafite Rothschild brands in China, as it was implicated in another case in 2016.
 
Following the win, a search of 柏翠堡正牌 on China’s database of trademarks shows that it’s now inactive, whereas Petrus’ trademarked Chinese name 伯萃斯 is active and valid till April 13, 2025.
 
Known brands such as Penfolds and Lafite have all been mired in lengthy lawsuit to defend its intellectual property rights in China, which is often criticized by legal experts for its lax IP projections.
 
The country has stepped up its efforts to protect IP rights. In 2019, it amended its trademark law to curb bad faith filings.
編輯:Frida Xu
相關(guān)新聞
  • 暫無數(shù)據(jù)。。。
總排行
月排行

—— 融媒體矩陣 ——

主站蜘蛛池模板: 91欧美激情一区二区三区成人 | 亚洲视频在线观看网站 | 精品亚洲一区二区 | 久久久久成人精品一区二区 | 精品日韩欧美一区二区三区 | 中文国产成人精品久久96 | 国产日韩在线观看视频网站 | 亚洲欧美自拍偷拍 | 精品国产亚洲一区二区三区 | 日本久久网 | 亚洲黄色一区 | 国产精品亚洲精品日韩动图 | 91在线精品亚洲一区二区 | 一级毛片视频播放 | 国产成人精品久久亚洲高清不卡 | 久色视频在线 | 久久91精品国产91久久小草 | 午夜一区二区三区 | 欧美喷水| 国产欧美在线观看视频 | 91精品久久久久久久久久 | 欧美日韩第一页 | 久久人精品 | 亚洲va欧美 | 国产欧美一区二区精品久久久 | 成人免费国产欧美日韩你懂的 | 香港经典a毛片免费观看…伊人色综合久久 | 911亚洲精品国内自产 | 日本亚洲国产精品久久 | 欧美成人禁片在线www | 91精品观看91久久久久久 | 色网电影 | 欧美日韩精品在线播放 | 欧美日韩国产一区二区三区在线观看 | 中文在线第一页 | 九九九九热精品免费视频 | 国内精品免费视频 | 久久国产毛片 | 日韩精品欧美高清区 | 国产成人在线免费视频 | 日韩中文在线视频 |