中文字幕网在线_欧美国产一区二区三区_三级av_国产精品免费一区二区_国产2区_日韩精品一区二区三区中文在线

中國(guó)酒業(yè)新聞網(wǎng)

華夏酒報(bào)官方網(wǎng)站

官方
微信
官方
微博
首頁 > English > 正文
Petrus wins trademark case in China
來源:Vino Joy News  2021-07-01 16:21 作者:NATALIE WANG
Bordeaux’s storied winery, Petrus, has secured a victory in China against fraudsters who are churning out non-existent Petrus second wine that was first spotted at the country’s biggest wine fair.
 
The judgement handed down by the Beijing People’s High Court upheld two previous court rulings that ruled in favor of the Pomerol estate against Wenzhou-based wine company, 溫州柏翠堡進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易有限公司 for the infringement of its legally trademarked Chinese name “伯萃斯”.
 
The Bordeaux winery was apparently alerted by a report that was done by me in 2017 at the China Food and Drinks Fair (Chengdu), the country’s biggest wine and spirits fair, when flagrant fakes were on open display at Kempski hotel. The fakes were so emboldened and prevalent, it could be best described as “Disneyland of fake wines”.
 
One of the copycat wines was produced none other but the Wenzhou company, claiming the lookalike PACURS as Petrus’ second label, which the Pomerol estate never produced. It also trademark a similar Chinese transliteration of Petrus “柏翠堡正牌” in 2015.
 
During the court proceedings, Petrus cited the report as part of the evidences it presented.
 
 
PACURS produced by Whenzhou based wine company 溫州柏翠堡進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易有限公司 has the look and feel of Petrus, but it is definitely not the second wine of Petrus. (pic: Taobao)
The 2017 report prompted Petrus to file a lawsuit against the Chinese company the next year at Beijing Intellectual Property Court, citing the Wenzhou company’s wine violated its officially trademarked Chinese name “伯萃斯”, which it had applied in 2014 one year before the Wenzhou company.
 
According to court documents released, Petrus argues the Wenzhou company used a similar sounding name and design to mislead the public, violating Article 30 of the Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China. This led to the court ruling in favour of Petrus.
 
However, the Wenzhou company appealed the case subsequently to the National Intellectual Property Court and ultimately Beijing High Court. Both upheld previous court ruling, handing Petrus a victory to use its trademarked Chinese name.
 
The Beijing High Court ruled that when two trademarks are applied on similar goods, the trademark rights is therefore granted on a first-come, first-served principle. In this case, Petrus .
 
Interestingly, this is not the first time the Wenzhou company was thrust into fake wine controversy. It is also the distributor of one of the fake Chateau Lafite Rothschild brands in China, as it was implicated in another case in 2016.
 
Following the win, a search of 柏翠堡正牌 on China’s database of trademarks shows that it’s now inactive, whereas Petrus’ trademarked Chinese name 伯萃斯 is active and valid till April 13, 2025.
 
Known brands such as Penfolds and Lafite have all been mired in lengthy lawsuit to defend its intellectual property rights in China, which is often criticized by legal experts for its lax IP projections.
 
The country has stepped up its efforts to protect IP rights. In 2019, it amended its trademark law to curb bad faith filings.
編輯:Frida Xu
相關(guān)新聞
  • 暫無數(shù)據(jù)。。。
總排行
月排行

—— 融媒體矩陣 ——

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产伦精品一区二区三区网站 | 国产99精品| 国产在线一区在线视频 | 国产在线观看第一页 | 视频日韩p影院永久免费 | 国内精品视频 | 日韩视频欧美视频 | 久久久不卡国产精品一区二区 | 精品一区二区三区免费毛片爱 | 国产精品一区二区在线观看 | 欧美第一区 | 欧美日一区二区三区 | 久久国产精品免费一区二区三区 | 欧美一区二区三区在线播放 | 亚洲精品视频区 | 国产真实乱人偷精品 | 一区二区三区成人 | 亚洲精品99久久久久中文字幕 | 国产区在线视频 | 国产高清a毛片在线看 | 波多野吉衣在线观看 | 欧美成人高清在线视频大全 | 伊人中文| 亚洲欧美日韩色图 | 国产精品伦理久久久久 | 国内精品久久久久久久97牛牛 | 久久久一区二区三区不卡 | 在线免费观看国产 | 国产免费一级片 | 国产性做久久久久久 | 久久精品a一国产成人免费网站 | 欧美日韩国产va另类 | 永久毛片 | 伊人精品国产 | 亚洲美女一区二区三区 | 亚洲 欧洲 另类 综合 自拍 | 在线观看国产黄色 | 中文字幕日韩一区二区三区不卡 | 久久久久久久岛国免费播放 | 国产欧美色图 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区九九 |